First read is on us.

Subscribe today to keep up with the latest travel industry news.

Spain Regulator Cites Booking.com for Abusive Practices But Lowers Penalty by $90 Million


SON NET The Suites

Skift Take

Should Booking.com have the right to compel Spanish hotels what rates they can charge on their own websites? That is the heart of the issue.
Summarize this story

Select a question above or ask something else

Summarize this story

Spain’s competition authority in February levied a draft fine of $530 million against Booking.com, but issued a final ruling today lowering the penalty to around $446 million.

In its announcement Tuesday, the CNMC didn’t specify why it lowered the fines some $90 million.

Parent company Booking Holdings already took a $530 million loss for the penalty in the fourth quarter of 2023.

The CNMC said Tuesday that Booking.com “committed two abuses of its dominant position,” starting January 1, 2019. The regulator said Booking.com’s hotel market position in Spain has fluctuated since 2019 from 70-90%.

The regulator alleges that Booking.com imposed anticompetitive commercial conditions on hotels and stifled competition from other online travel agencies.

A Booking.com spokesperson vowed to appeal the fines.

The regulator said Booking.com barred participating hotels from offering lower prices on their own websites than on Booking.com. In addition, the CNMC charged that Booking.com wasn’t transparent about profitability when hotels participated in plans — called Preferred and Preferred Plus — to increase their visibility on Booking.com or when participating in the company’s Genius loyalty program.

In addition, Booking.com allegedly hampered competition from online travel agencies because it made hotel visibility, or where properties appear in search results, on Booking.com dependent on reservations volume.

The $446 million penalty is actually divided into two fines, of an equal amount.

Booking Holdings Will Appeal

Booking Holdings argues that such competition issues should be the purview of the entire European Union, and not be litigated on a country by country basis. Spain is an EU member.

Airbnb takes a similar position in Europe when it comes to regulation, arguing for uniform rules and not each country having the wherewithal to issue their own rulings.

Booking Holdings stated Tuesday: “We strongly disagree with the outcome of the CNMC investigation and intend to appeal this unprecedented decision. We have said before that the EU’s Digital Market Act is the right forum to discuss and assess the majority of these issues, presenting an opportunity to agree on solutions that apply across Europe rather than country by country.

“Booking.com operates in a highly competitive sector, and in an industry characterized by a high degree of choice for businesses and consumers alike. We offer accommodation partners support programs such as our Preferred Plus and Genius that they can opt into. The decision today by the CNMC does not take this into account, adding to a lack of consistency for consumers and accommodation partners in Spain, against a global backdrop.”

The penalties stemmed from a 2021 complaint filed by the Spanish Association of Hotel Managers and the Madrid Hotel Business Association.

Up Next

Business Travel

The State of Corporate Travel and Expense 2025

A new report explores how for travel and finance managers are targeting enhanced ROI, new opportunities, greater efficiencies, time and money savings, and better experiences for employees with innovative travel and expense management solutions.
Sponsored
Airlines

Japan Airlines Under Cyberattack, Flights Delayed

The operational disruption, though temporary, highlights the aviation sector's vulnerability, especially at a time when airlines are ramping up digital innovation to improve customer experience.
Hotels

U.S. Hotels May Have Hit Occupancy Ceiling in 2024

Hotels aren't full! (Except in Manhattan.) One theory why is that corporate travelers — who used to book rooms for days or weeks at a time — are taking shorter trips because of hybrid work.