Support Skift’s Independent JournalismMake a Contribution Now
Persian Gulf carriers expanding rapidly in the U.S. are diverting passengers from Delta, American and United instead of attracting new travelers as they have said, according to a study by a group representing the U.S. airlines.
The loss of those customers is a key argument of the U.S. carriers in their claims that Emirates Airline, Qatar Airways Ltd., and Etihad Airways PJSC are using $42 billion in government subsidies to compete unfairly. All three gulf carriers have repeatedly denied the accusations.
Chief Executive Officers from Delta, American, and United are appearing Friday in Washington to press their view that their Gulf rivals are using discount connections through their hubs in the Middle East to win international traffic. The U.S. airlines want the Obama administration to block those carriers from adding new flights pending the outcome of talks on modifying Open Skies agreements with Qatar and the United Arab Emirates.
More About Open Skies:
- Etihad’s New Open Skies Tactic: Sports Sponsorships, Brand USA Partnership in Open Skies Fight
- Future of Open Skies Hinges on the Definition of One Word: Subsidy
- The Lobbying Groups in the Fight for Open Skies Over U.S. Airspace
“The gulf carriers have failed to meaningfully stimulate new traffic to and from the United States,” according to a study by economic consultant Compass Lexecon being released Friday by the Partnership for Open and Fair Skies. “As a result, the traffic gains enjoyed by the Gulf carriers due to their subsidized expansion to the United States and elsewhere have come at the expense of U.S. and other carriers.”
About 11,000 new daily seats were added between the U.S. and Dubai, Doha and Abu Dhabi from 2008 to 2014, with more than 95 percent from the gulf airlines. At the same time, there was essentially no change in the traffic originating or concluding at either end of those routes, the study said.
A single gulf carrier with as little as a 3 percent market share on a route between a U.S. city and an international destination reduces the number of passengers for a U.S. airline by 8 percent, on average, the study said. Where all three gulf carriers serve the route, U.S. airlines’ passengers fall by 24 percent, according to Compass Lexecon.
The analysis looked at both traffic between the U.S. and the hubs of Emirates, Qatar, and Etihad and travel between the U.S. and points beyond those cities, such as India.
U.S. carriers that dominate a market will always lose some market share when a new airline begins service, Etihad general counsel James Callaghan said in an interview.
“They are being forced to compete,” Callaghan said. “When you compete, your prices go down and, therefore, you attract more passengers. The overall size of those markets where they do compete with us, they have actually increased their passenger numbers. That’s called competition. That’s the success of Open Skies.”
Etihad said the U.S. carriers received about $64.9 billion in bankruptcy and pension-related aid from the U.S. government, benefits which are generally only available to U.S. carriers and which helped to create a “highly distorted market.” Etihad commissioned research that shows “no evidence whatsoever” of any harm to U.S. counterparts.
The U.S. government is accepting comments on the complaints from American Airlines Group Inc., Delta Air Lines Inc. and United Continental Holdings into May. After that, it will decide whether to initiate Open Skies discussions.
–With assistance from Alan Levin in Washington and Julie Johnsson in Chicago.
This article was written by Mary Schlangenstein from Bloomberg and was legally licensed through the NewsCred publisher network.