Digital Booking Sites

Researchers find independent hotel owners more likely than chains to post fake reviews

Excerpt from Slate Magazine

Aug 16, 2012 4:36 am

Skift Take

This Slate articles battles the pros and cons of online hotel reviews which benefit from crowd-sourced opinions, but are vulnerable to the schemers who skew testimonies in their favor.

— Samantha Shankman

Free Report: The State of Student Travel

The Internet has fundamentally changed the way that buyers and sellers meet and interact in the marketplace. Online retailers make it cheap and easy to browse, comparison shop, and make purchases with the click of a mouse. The Web can also, in theory, make for better-informed purchases—both online and off—thanks to sites that offer crowdsourced reviews of everything from dog walkers to dentists.

In a Web-enabled world, it should be harder for careless or unscrupulous businesses to exploit consumers. Yet recent studies suggest that online reviewing is hardly a perfect consumer defense system. Researchers at Yale, Dartmouth, and USC have found evidence that hotel owners post fake reviews to boost their ratings on the site—and might even be posting negative reviews of nearby competitors.

Read the Complete Story →

Tags: , , ,

Next Up

More on Skift

Starwood Betting That High Cost of Mobile Check-Ins Will Be Worth It
Expedia Expects to Get Pressured by TripAdvisor, Its Largest Search Partner
B2B Travel Startups Need to Show Personality on Social Media
Becoming Guest-Centric: Why Hotel Marketing Needs to Change