Skift

Online Travel

Airbnb’s Supposed Independent Host Clubs Are Run by the Company: New Report

  • Skift Take
    Airbnb’s stealthy financing and leadership of supposedly grassroots host clubs around the world to pursue the short-term rental giant’s advocacy agenda may be an effective tactic, but it furthers a false narrative about the nature of the company, and it is a blotch on its reputation.

    Online Travel This Week

    A new report based on interviews with nearly two dozen former Airbnb public policy staffers found that the company’s supposedly independently run host clubs, key elements in Airbnb’s purported grassroots lobbying campaigns around the world, are funded and directed by Airbnb.

    “Home Sharing Clubs are associations of selected Airbnb landlords who are resourced, mobilized and coordinated by Airbnb public policy teams to advocate for favorable regulation,” reads the University of Manchester report, which was supported by Ethical Consumer. “These associations are made up of an unrepresentative segment of Airbnb landlords — mainly those that share their own homes or rent them short-term.” [See the report embedded below.]

    While Airbnb’s verbiage about the clubs often revolves around fostering community and helping hosts learn from other hosts, the primary aim is to enhance Airbnb’s lobbying efforts against regulatory incursions from San Francisco to New York and Barcelona, the report said. Airbnb said it has more than 300 clubs in 220 countries.

    Part of that effort is to foster the impression, based on the fact that club membership is carefully curated to lean toward individual hosts, that Airbnb stands for the little guy or gal trying to eke out a living by renting out a room or two.

    But the Manchester University report claims only 8 percent of Airbnb’s listings are one room in a home, and that 59 percent of listings actually come from professional property managers and other corporations. We reported recently that around 5 percent of hosts control nearly a third of rentals, while Airbnb says that individual hosts are 90 percent of the pie.

    “Airbnb’s public narratives continue to highlight a minority of cases on the platform, misleadingly suggesting that they are representative of the business,” the report said, referring to the way Airbnb curates club membership to skew toward individual hosts.

    Airbnb staff provides “extensive” support to the clubs, including helping them coordinate protests, rehearsing curated stories about their experiences as hosts, and offering them other training, according to the study, which purports to be the first-in-depth look at “platform-sponsored grassroots lobbying.”

    While some former staff that the university interviewed endorsed Airbnb’s host club strategy as effective and worthy because it increased citizens’ involvement in local politics, “there are also concerns about insufficient public transparency about the support offered by the company; and fears that Airbnb’s tactics give them further unfair political advantages over local citizen campaigns and governments,” the report said.

    For its part, Airbnb’s response to the report notes the company announced formation of host clubs at a 2015 press conference, and that it was “proud to assist” the first club in San Francisco fight an adverse ballot measure. The company declined to elaborate further.

    One of the main problems with these corporate-backed and supposedly grassroots clubs — and it is a tactic used by other gig economy companies such as Uber, Lyft, and Doordash — is the lack of transparency, and the unfair advantages they have over legitimately grassroots affordable housing advocates, for example. Not that the latter are always pure or free of hotel lobbying interests, for example.

    The Manchester University report calls for reforms, including public disclosures of funds provided for “corporate grassroots lobbying,” and details about companies’ use of employees and consultants in lobbying efforts. Airbnb has 25 employees of its Community Leaders team who “guide” host club development, and there is no public disclosure about the dollars allocated toward host club efforts.

    In Brief

    Travel Ad Spending Is Down But Not Out

    U.S. travel advertisers spent $190 million across TV, online advertising and print during the first two months of 2021, a 66 percent plunge compared with the year-ago period, according to MediaRadar. But that $190 million spend represented a 33 percent jump since the fourth quarter of 2020, denoting that a travel recovery is picking up steam. Biggest spenders were Southwest, Walt Disney World, American Cruise Lines, and the South Carolina and Florida tourism boards.

    China’s Trip.com Group Enters the Advertising Biz

    With hotel discounting in China notorious and the low commissions it gets from Chinese airlines, Trip.com Group is entering the content and advertising business. It could generate a healthy new revenue stream, and foster more traveler engagement. Having Tripadvisor as its joint venture partner in China doesn’t hurt, either. Skift

    Online Travel Innovation Took No Pandemic Break

    From Tripadvisor getting into the traveler subscription business to Kayak opening a hotel in Miami, online travel companies have been busy remaking themselves during the pandemic. Skift’s Sean O’Neill has the details. Skift

    Download (PDF, 4.12MB)

    Subscribe Now

    Already a member?

    Already a member?

    Subscribe to Skift Pro to get unlimited access to stories like these

    Subscribe Now

    Already a member?

    Exit mobile version