Trump is prevailing at the Supreme Court on the administration's travel ban cases for the most part. Hope that the judiciary would serve as a break on Trump's excesses is fading because of the High Court decisions.
The U.S. Supreme Court dropped one of two cases over President Donald Trump’s travel ban, suggesting it will sidestep a constitutional showdown and let lower courts take the first look at the latest version of the policy.
Granting a Trump administration request Tuesday, the justices dismissed an appeal over a provision that expired last month in an earlier version of the travel ban. The remaining appeal, which also involves refugee limits that are still in effect, may meet the same fate later this month when those restrictions expire Oct. 24.
The five-sentence order said the justices “express no view on the merits” of the dispute. Even before the high court acted, the focus of the clash was already shifting to federal trial courts around the country, where opponents are taking steps to press new challenges. The issue is almost certain to return to the Supreme Court in some form.
The high court had already canceled the travel-ban argument it had scheduled for Tuesday.
The Supreme Court also set aside a federal appeals court ruling that blocked the earlier policy and might have served as a helpful precedent for the new challenges. That’s a victory for the Trump administration, which urged the court to take that step. Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented from that part of the order.
The case the court dropped Tuesday was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union in Maryland. The remaining case is being pressed by Hawaii.
Both groups of challengers say Trump is exceeding his authority under federal immigration laws and violating the Constitution by targeting Muslims. The opponents had asked the Supreme Court to keep the case and issue a ruling.
The revised policy, issued Sept. 24, limits or bans entry into the U.S. from eight countries: Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria, Yemen, Chad, North Korea and Venezuela. It supersedes a ban that had affected six mostly Muslim countries.
The case dismissed Tuesday is Trump v. International Refugee Assistance Project, 16-1436. The other case is Trump v. Hawaii, 16-1540.
©2017 Bloomberg L.P.
Subscribe to Skift Pro
Subscribe to Skift Pro to get unlimited access to stories like these ($30/month)Subscribe Now
Photo Credit: With some exceptions, the U.S. Supreme Court is largely siding with the President when it comes to his curbs on visitors and refugees. Bloomberg
U.S. Extends Travel Ban for Canada and Mexico Land Borders Through August 21
The decision to extend closures for another month is an enormous setback for many businesses as they are continuing to miss out on large amounts of revenue this busy summer season.
David Shepardson, Reuters | 2 months ago
U.S. Commerce Secretary Dodges on Details for How to Help Hotels Revive International Travel
U.S. Commerce Secretary Raimondo hears your concerns, hotel industry. But how about some action? Until U.S. authorities outline a clear path to reviving key global business travel corridors, many sleepless nights are ahead, wondering what happens after Labor Day when leisure travel dissipates.
Cameron Sperance, Skift | 3 months ago