That’s at least what the transportation network companies faced with potential new regulations say. Lawmakers, unionized taxicab drivers and other supporters of the legislation argue the bill promotes public safety.
Lawmakers across the country are beginning to turn their attention to regulating ride-hailing firms. Already eight states and the District of Columbia have enacted laws addressing them, according to a tally from the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America, a trade group that supports the bill in New Jersey. Four other states await action on measures from their governors.
In New Jersey, legislators are beginning to focus on Gov. Chris Christie’s 2016 budget, so a bipartisan measure regulating the ride-hailing companies is stalled at the moment after passing an Assembly committee in March — though lawmakers and other observers are optimistic it will continue to weave its way through the Legislature.
A similar bill in the state Senate is awaiting committee action. Christie typically does not comment on bills before they reach his desk.
The legislation calls for a number of new requirements, including requiring ride-hailing firms to display a Motor Vehicle Commission marker when drivers are searching for fares, background checks for drivers as well as safety inspections for vehicles.
Proponents argue the measure protects riders from public safety concerns by requiring criminal background checks through the State Police. They also say the bill would “level the playing field” between ride-hailing firms, which frequently charge lower rates, and taxis, which are already heavily regulated.
Lionel Leach, the president of Communication Workers of America Local 1039, which represents about 300 cab drivers in New Jersey, pointed to a recent news report that alleged a rider nearly became the robbery victim of a driver. New Jersey does not track crime statistics by cab, livery or ride-hailing services, making claims difficult to vet.
Leach says companies like Uber have given taxicab drivers a wakeup call by innovating and that ride-booking companies improve the industry overall. “Look, at the end of the day, it’s great technology,” he said. “But my concern is not about how cheap their fares are. It’s the public safety part of it.”
The companies say they’re dedicated to safety. Uber announced plans last month to establish a safety advisory board to review the firm’s practices.
Uber and Lyft have also taken steps to expand insurance coverage, a major sticking point in the regulations debate.
Since the Assembly committee passed its bill, ride-hailing companies have signed onto an agreement with a number of major insurers committing to close what is called the coverage gap. Currently, when ride-booking drivers are looking for fares they are not required to be covered by commercial insurance. The New Jersey bill and others around the country would require such coverage.
Assemblyman Jack Ciatarelli, the only Republican sponsor of the Assembly bill, says he backed it because he favored leveling the playing field, but said that development could negate the need for legislation.
“The market place may correct itself,” he said. “Markets do that.”
Leach and Democratic Assemblyman Joe Lagana predicted the bill could be on Christie’s desk by summer.
“After all, we’re legislators,” Lagana said. “And we’re going to do what’s in the public interest.”