A fifth possible signal from the missing Malaysian Air jet gave investigators another critical data point to plot the launch of a remote-controlled submarine to scour the Indian Ocean seabed.
The transmission heard by an air-dropped buoy equipped with sensors was “in the vicinity” of where the Australian navy vessel Ocean Shield detected acoustic chirps deemed to be from beacons on the airliner’s black boxes, Australia’s Joint Agency Coordination Centre said yesterday.
Pinpointing where and when to use the slow-moving sub will be pivotal, according to Dukane Seacom, which makes the pingers. Noise from the submersible would make it difficult to hear pulses at the same time, heightening the urgency to settle on an underwater patrol zone before the units’ batteries die and sever search crews’ only link to debris from Flight 370.
“What they’re trying to do right now is maximize the little remaining time they have left in the life of the pingers to localize the search area as much as possible,” said Jim Gibson, general manager of Phoenix International Holdings Inc., whose personnel are part of the search effort.
Malaysian Airline System Bhd.’s Flight 370 vanished en route to Beijing from Kuala Lumpur on March 8 with 239 people on board. With the hunt for the Boeing Co. 777-200ER entering its 34th day today, the beacons marking the jet’s cockpit-voice and flight-data recorders are at the edge of — if not beyond — the 30-day projected limit of their power packs.
“The more dots they can put on the map in terms of signals, then they can use the readings to narrow in,” Dukane Seacom President Anish Patel said in a phone interview from Sarasota, Florida, where the company is based.
That means waiting to deploy the Bluefin-21 unmanned submarine from the Ocean Shield, even though it’s tempting to do so now, Phoenix’s Gibson said in an interview. A team from Largo, Maryland-based Phoenix is aboard the Australian ship to run the towed pinger locator under contract for the U.S. Navy.
Bluefin-21 will scan the ocean bottom with soundwaves once the search zone is refined, according to the JACC. Sonar produces images identifying possible wreckage just as a sonogram shows human organs under the skin, enabling the sub to operate in an area where water depths exceeding about 4,500 meters (14,800 feet) keep the seabed in perpetual darkness.
The possible signal detected by a sonobuoy from a Royal Australian Air Force AP-3C Orion patrol plane “will require further analysis overnight, but shows potential of being from a man-made source,” retired Air Chief Marshal Angus Houston, who heads the JACC, said in a statement.
False leads, dashed hopes and the failure to find any physical evidence have marked most of the mystery of Flight 370 so far. The Ocean Shield detected two signals on April 5 and two more on April 8.
In laboratory tests, batteries on the pingers have lasted as long as 42 days “at a much lower rate,” although after Day 40, the signal probably would be so weak as to not be worth the effort to find it, Dukane Seacom’s Patel said.
“You’d have to be right on top of it” to locate it after Day 40, he said. “This is all bonus time.”
A typical battery begins to fade after 35 days and loses “meaningful output” from 38 to 40 days, Patel said. The power declines to one-eighth to one-fourth of its normal level, he said.
“I’m glad to hear they’re still picking up signals,” he said. “That means our batteries are still doing their thing.”
Pulses from the beacons may travel farther than two miles (3.2 kilometers) in “real-world” conditions compared with laboratory tests, Patel said. Underwater temperature inversion layers known as thermoclines also can bend or reflect sound waves.
“Because of the thermoclines, because of the way the ocean can channel the sound depending on currents and topology, you may get more travel,” Patel said. “A lot of different things factor into that.”
Both pingers on the two black boxes may be sending signals, and they could have ended up far apart underwater in the search zone, Patel said. That may explain why authorities haven’t further pinpointed where the signals are coming from. Pingers also can come loose in a crash, as occurred when Air France Flight 447 plunged into the Atlantic Ocean in 2009.
Patel said Dukane Seacom, a unit of Hollywood, Florida- based Heico Corp., has analyzed the findings from Ocean Shield and concluded that the signals were consistent with those from the company’s pingers.
Until the sonobuoy finding, the signals detected by ship had been the chief source of optimism among investigators that they were getting close to locating debris from the Boeing 777.
“Narrowing the probability circle” of where a debris field lies is critical to an efficient underwater search, said John Fish, a principal of Bourne, Massachusetts-based American Underwater Search & Survey Ltd.
The four spots where the Phoenix team heard pinger sounds span a zone as long as 30 kilometers long on one side, according to the JACC. Even if that were tightened somewhat, a sonar-based hunt would take at least 20 days, said Fish, who has participated in numerous such searches.
If the Phoenix team can cut the zone to a square about 10 kilometers on a side, the search time would shrink to less than a week, Fish said in an interview.
Flight 370’s disappearance is now the longest in modern airline history, baffling authorities because contact was lost less than an hour into a routine trip as the jet headed north over the Gulf of Thailand. After vanishing from radar, the wide- body craft doubled back, flew over Peninsular Malaysia and on into some of the world’s most remote waters.
While the motive behind that heading remains unknown, Flight 370 was deliberately steered south on a path ending in the Indian Ocean, Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak has said.
With assistance from John Walcott in Washington, Shamim Adam and Kyunghee Park in Singapore, Jason Scott in Perth, Laura Hurst in London, Zachary Tracer in New York, Michael Heath, Edward Johnson, David Fickling, Narayanan Somasundaram and Michael Sin in Sydney and Andrea Rothman in Toulouse.
To contact the reporters on this story: Thomas Black in Dallas at email@example.com; Alan Levin in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org. To contact the editors responsible for this story: Bernard Kohn at email@example.com; Ed Dufner at firstname.lastname@example.org; Anand Krishnamoorthy at email@example.com.