“Best of” and “worst of” rankings are perennially popular fodder for publications. They are great for grabbing headlines, stirring up controversy and baiting hyperlinks. Their sensationalism means rankings–especially “worst of” rankings–also can be litigation-bait. Fortunately, a recent court ruling found that publishing a “best of”/”worst of” ranking didn’t create defamation liability. Surely, this opinion will appear on several “best of 2012″ lists itself.
The “dirtiest” hotels on one of TripAdvisor’s lists sued for defamation, but because the lists are based off a compilation of user reviews, it is should be understood that they represent opinions, not facts.
Rentals & Shares
Google Vacation Rental Partners Diverge on Whether to Name Guests in Reviews
Moving Beyond Demographics: Data Drives the Future of Travel Advertising
Tour Injury Lawsuit Tests Whether TripAdvisor Is Liability-Free
The Most Important Story in Online Travel in 2019
A Drop in European Visitors to Thailand Is a Wake-Up Call