“Best of” and “worst of” rankings are perennially popular fodder for publications. They are great for grabbing headlines, stirring up controversy and baiting hyperlinks. Their sensationalism means rankings–especially “worst of” rankings–also can be litigation-bait. Fortunately, a recent court ruling found that publishing a “best of”/”worst of” ranking didn’t create defamation liability. Surely, this opinion will appear on several “best of 2012″ lists itself.
The “dirtiest” hotels on one of TripAdvisor’s lists sued for defamation, but because the lists are based off a compilation of user reviews, it is should be understood that they represent opinions, not facts.
Can TripAdvisor Blame Its Hotel-Bidding Slump on Expedia or Priceline?
TripAdvisor Aims to Keep Up Its TV Ad Blitz to Lift Its Sagging Hotel Business
Travel This Week — What to Expect: TripAdvisor and Priceline Strategy Tweaks
TripAdvisor’s Global Food Delivery Expansion Pressures Hotels to Adapt