“Best of” and “worst of” rankings are perennially popular fodder for publications. They are great for grabbing headlines, stirring up controversy and baiting hyperlinks. Their sensationalism means rankings–especially “worst of” rankings–also can be litigation-bait. Fortunately, a recent court ruling found that publishing a “best of”/”worst of” ranking didn’t create defamation liability. Surely, this opinion will appear on several “best of 2012″ lists itself.
The “dirtiest” hotels on one of TripAdvisor’s lists sued for defamation, but because the lists are based off a compilation of user reviews, it is should be understood that they represent opinions, not facts.
Is the Metasearch Model in Big Trouble?
How Customer Data and Dynamic Inventory Can Deliver Better Travel Buying Experiences
TripAdvisor Sees Decline in Hotel Shoppers After Travel Industry Advertising Reset
Rentals & Shares
Airbnb Could Be Worth More Than Any Hotel Company
The Most Highly Compensated Online Travel CEOs of 2018