“Best of” and “worst of” rankings are perennially popular fodder for publications. They are great for grabbing headlines, stirring up controversy and baiting hyperlinks. Their sensationalism means rankings–especially “worst of” rankings–also can be litigation-bait. Fortunately, a recent court ruling found that publishing a “best of”/”worst of” ranking didn’t create defamation liability. Surely, this opinion will appear on several “best of 2012″ lists itself.
The “dirtiest” hotels on one of TripAdvisor’s lists sued for defamation, but because the lists are based off a compilation of user reviews, it is should be understood that they represent opinions, not facts.
Highest-Paid Online Travel CEOs of 2018
The Evolution of a Destination: This Island Is Tapping History to Build a Better, Forward-Looking Tourism Industry
TripAdvisor Pressured Into Making Additional Reforms to Support Sexual Assault Victims
Google May Face New U.S. Justice Department Antitrust Probe
TripAdvisor Responds to Critics by Changing How It Displays Hotel Reviews About Sexual Assault