“Best of” and “worst of” rankings are perennially popular fodder for publications. They are great for grabbing headlines, stirring up controversy and baiting hyperlinks. Their sensationalism means rankings–especially “worst of” rankings–also can be litigation-bait. Fortunately, a recent court ruling found that publishing a “best of”/”worst of” ranking didn’t create defamation liability. Surely, this opinion will appear on several “best of 2012″ lists itself.
The “dirtiest” hotels on one of TripAdvisor’s lists sued for defamation, but because the lists are based off a compilation of user reviews, it is should be understood that they represent opinions, not facts.
UK Regulator Persuades More Travel Brands to Stop Hate-Selling
Costa Rica Offers Meeting Attendees a Natural Opportunity for Personal and Professional Development
Rentals & Shares
Airbnb Gets New Power to Inform on Rivals When They Are Scofflaws
TripAdvisor Drops Outmoded Little Wiser Owl Character From Ads
TripAdvisor Plots Loyalty Program in Campaign Against Google