“Best of” and “worst of” rankings are perennially popular fodder for publications. They are great for grabbing headlines, stirring up controversy and baiting hyperlinks. Their sensationalism means rankings–especially “worst of” rankings–also can be litigation-bait. Fortunately, a recent court ruling found that publishing a “best of”/”worst of” ranking didn’t create defamation liability. Surely, this opinion will appear on several “best of 2012″ lists itself.
The “dirtiest” hotels on one of TripAdvisor’s lists sued for defamation, but because the lists are based off a compilation of user reviews, it is should be understood that they represent opinions, not facts.
Popular Travel Apps Shared Detailed User Information With Facebook
How Hyatt Is Taking Steps to Incorporate Wellness Into Every Aspect of Its Business
Expedia Isn’t Ready to Invest Big in Restaurant Reservations
TripAdvisor Launches Redesign to Hook the Non-Bookers
TripAdvisor Reduced Its Google Spend But Will Expand TV Advertising