“Best of” and “worst of” rankings are perennially popular fodder for publications. They are great for grabbing headlines, stirring up controversy and baiting hyperlinks. Their sensationalism means rankings–especially “worst of” rankings–also can be litigation-bait. Fortunately, a recent court ruling found that publishing a “best of”/”worst of” ranking didn’t create defamation liability. Surely, this opinion will appear on several “best of 2012″ lists itself.
The “dirtiest” hotels on one of TripAdvisor’s lists sued for defamation, but because the lists are based off a compilation of user reviews, it is should be understood that they represent opinions, not facts.
Rentals & Shares
No Shock or Awe at Booking Holdings About Airbnb’s Buy of HotelTonight
New eBook: The Travel Marketer’s Guide to Mastering Display Advertising
TripAdvisor Plots Inspiration Path in Google’s Shadow
TripAdvisor Sees Booking Site Spending Hit 4-Year Low
TripAdvisor Places Big Bets on Experience Bookers Rather Than Hotel Shoppers