“Best of” and “worst of” rankings are perennially popular fodder for publications. They are great for grabbing headlines, stirring up controversy and baiting hyperlinks. Their sensationalism means rankings–especially “worst of” rankings–also can be litigation-bait. Fortunately, a recent court ruling found that publishing a “best of”/”worst of” ranking didn’t create defamation liability. Surely, this opinion will appear on several “best of 2012″ lists itself.
The “dirtiest” hotels on one of TripAdvisor’s lists sued for defamation, but because the lists are based off a compilation of user reviews, it is should be understood that they represent opinions, not facts.
TripAdvisor’s Review Investigators Discover a Huge Travel-Robocall Scam
TripAdvisor in the Age of Platforms Tries the Full-Service Model
Enhancing Loyalty: Best Practices for CRM Systems in Asia-Pacific
TripAdvisor: Non-Hotel Revenue Could Reach One-Third of Total by 2020
TrustYou Acquired as User-Generated Reviews Sector Heats Up