“Best of” and “worst of” rankings are perennially popular fodder for publications. They are great for grabbing headlines, stirring up controversy and baiting hyperlinks. Their sensationalism means rankings–especially “worst of” rankings–also can be litigation-bait. Fortunately, a recent court ruling found that publishing a “best of”/”worst of” ranking didn’t create defamation liability. Surely, this opinion will appear on several “best of 2012″ lists itself.
The “dirtiest” hotels on one of TripAdvisor’s lists sued for defamation, but because the lists are based off a compilation of user reviews, it is should be understood that they represent opinions, not facts.
Expedia Is Once Again Spending Big to Advertise on Trivago
TripAdvisor CFO Sees ‘Hotel-Like’ Commissions in a $1 Billion Tours and Activities Business
A Journey of 100 Taps: Is Your Booking Process Mobile-Ready?
TripAdvisor Debuts Facebook Messenger Chatbot for User-Generated Recommendations
TripAdvisor Chairman’s Takeover Comments Not a Vote of Confidence