“Best of” and “worst of” rankings are perennially popular fodder for publications. They are great for grabbing headlines, stirring up controversy and baiting hyperlinks. Their sensationalism means rankings–especially “worst of” rankings–also can be litigation-bait. Fortunately, a recent court ruling found that publishing a “best of”/”worst of” ranking didn’t create defamation liability. Surely, this opinion will appear on several “best of 2012″ lists itself.
The “dirtiest” hotels on one of TripAdvisor’s lists sued for defamation, but because the lists are based off a compilation of user reviews, it is should be understood that they represent opinions, not facts.
TripAdvisor Product Guru Adam Medros Is Leaving the Company
TripAdvisor CEO Responds to Analyst Critiques of Its Hotel Search Strategy
Jonathan Keane, Managing Director, Aviation at Accenture, on Staying Hyper-Relevant
Expedia IPO and Spin-Off History Sets Up Uber for a Deal-Making Era
8 Insights Into Uber CEO Pick Dara Khosrowshahi From Peers and Rivals