Transport Cars

Uber Calls Emerging Drivers’ Union ‘Bogus’

May 21, 2014 5:00 am

Skift Take

Is it possible to build a $10 billion business off the backs of customer-facing independent contractors? Uber will find out.

— Jason Clampet

Free Report: The Changing Business of Extended-Stay Hotels

Zbigniew Bzdak  / Chicago Tribune/MCT

Limousine driver Florian Bucea checks his Uber service in Chicago, Illinois, on March 25, 2013. The service allows riders to schedule service through a phone app and dispatches drivers. The company wants to expand service to the Chicago suburbs. Zbigniew Bzdak / Chicago Tribune/MCT


Rideshare drivers are forming their own union, but Uber claims the organization is “bogus.”

Over the weekend, hundreds of Uber drivers met to elect leaders for an App-Based Drivers’ Association. 500 drivers expressed interest in joining the union, the Seattle Times reports, in affiliation with a chapter of the highly aggressive Teamsters union.

Unionization efforts among a subset of Uber drivers aren’t new, particularly in Washington. Among the reasons behind the new organization, chief complaints include the following claims:

  1. No liability insurance
  2. Flaws in the driver rating system
  3. Unfair driver bans “without cause”

In conversation with VentureBeat, an Uber spokesperson responded to these claims with an unusually blunt response: “If an Uber driver wants to make a change they can talk to us directly – they don’t need a bogus organization like this to do that.”

In response to the App-Based Drivers’ Association’s rating complaints, Uber claims it takes feedback from both drivers and riders seriously [Bold: VentureBeat]:

“Feedback is a two-way street. At Uber, riders rate their experience and drivers do the same. Real-time feedback about drivers means Uber can correct for issues big and small – while ensuring that only the best drivers stay on the road. We take this feedback seriously – depending on the circumstances, rider feedback may lead to deactivating a partner from the system or serve as validation that the driver is providing great service. An Uber trip should be a good experience for drivers too – drivers shouldn’t have to deal with aggressive, violent, or disrespectful riders. If a rider exhibits disrespectful, threatening, or unsafe behavior, they, too, may no longer be able to use the service. You can learn more about our rating system here.”

A key complaint among the union’s drivers is a lack of job security, a frustration that seemingly contradicts the very foundation of Uber’s system. An Uber spokesperson verified by phone that drivers are not employees – they’re independent contractors. This means that any driver who joins Uber runs the same risks that every small business owner faces. It is unclear if Uber should be more explicit on this point in its promotional enlisting materials.

Uber states that its drivers “understand that they are being connected to riders through the technology platform,” and that the company encourages driver feedback. Meanwhile, Uber is rapidly expanding in the U.S. and recently landed a major endorsement from Google. In addition, while Uber has consistently clashed with the traditional taxi and limousine industry, the firm today hired away a top official at the Taxi and Limousine Commission.

This article originally appeared on VentureBeat

Tags: , ,

Next Up

More on Skift

Tourism PR Professionals Say How Social Media Changed Their Jobs
Exclusive: Pegasus Solutions Spins Off Reservations Business to Regent Equity Partners
Business Travelers Unsure if ‘Bleisure’ Travel Is Allowed, But Doing It Anyway
Free Webinar: How To Effectively Personalize Marketing Across Travel Sectors