Transport Airlines

DOJ’s American Airlines Merger Case is Flawed, Analyst Says

Excerpt from Ionosphere Capital

Sep 06, 2013 9:12 am

Skift Take

This analysis holds that neither US Airways nor American Airlines would thrive as independent airlines, and that there would be some consumer benefit in the merger. Agree or not, it makes for an interesting read.

— Dennis Schaal

Come Attend the Best Conference in Travel

Free Report: The Megatrends Defining Travel in 2015

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has a shot at blocking the American Airlines and US Airways merger, but only if their argument is supported by solid evidence that properly values pricing power in addition to quantifying concentration in city pairs that could be adversely impacted by having one less network airline. The DOJ will have to prove that any potential anticompetitive cost will exceed potential benefits produced by the merged airline. Potential benefits include lower average pricing throughout the entire network, especially in the U.S. domestic market….

Economies of density result in reductions in average costs as traffic volume on the given route is increased. This is the key benefit of the merger, and it cannot be excluded from the analysis of pricing power and concentration. Costs must be measured in revenue passenger mile terms, and when costs go down as a result of new economies of density, fares can be reduced on individual city-pairs even when there is less competition on that specific route.

Read the Complete Story →

Tags: , ,

Next Up

More on Skift

9 Charts That Show the State of International Travelers Staying at U.S. Hotels
New Trends Report: The Vacation Rental Technology Ecosystem
Google Adding 21 AccorHotels Brands to Its Instant Booking Product
How Singapore is Building the City of the Future