Destinations Australia, NZ & South Pacific

Hawaiian legislators are trying to make celebrities’ vacations less paparazzi-filled

Feb 01, 2013 7:48 am

Skift Take

The thought that a “Steven Tyler Act” describes anything other than dressing like a 60-year-old woman with multiple facelifts is hilarious enough on its own, but letting the thought of this law proceed this far speaks to how far some lawmakers will go to make a famous person happy.

— Jason Clampet

Register Now for Skift Global Forum

More than two-thirds of Hawaii’s state senators have signed onto a bill to protect celebrities from paparazzi, giving them power to sue over unwanted beach photos and other snapshots on the islands.

And the bill’s author says he’s pushing the law at the request of Aerosmith lead singer Steven Tyler, the former “American Idol” judge who recently bought a new home in Maui.

A representative for Aerosmith declined comment late Thursday night, saying Tyler was not immediately available.

Maui Democrat Sen. Kalani English told The Associated Press the so-called “Steven Tyler Act” will help Hawaii’s tourism and film industries, encouraging famous people to come here without fear of being stalked by paparazzi.

“These are my consituents as well,” English said. “Public figures have a right to reasonable privacy. There’s a balance that we need to create.”

The bill would open people up to civil lawsuits if they invade the privacy of public figures by taking or selling photos or videos. It defines invasion of privacy as capturing or trying to capture images or sound of people “in a manner that is offensive to a reasonable person” during personal or family moments. It does not specify places where pictures would be OK or whether public places would be exempt. The bill says it would apply to people who are take photos from boats or anywhere else within ocean waters.

“Although their celebrity status may justify a lower expectation of privacy, the Legislature finds that sometimes the paparazzi go too far to disturb the peace and tranquility afforded celebrities who escape to Hawaii for a quiet life,” English wrote in the bill.

Longtime Hawaii media lawyer Jeff Portnoy said the legislation is vague and panders to celebrities.

“It’s unnecessary, it’s potentially unconstitutional and it flies in the face of decades of privacy law,” he said.

He said that it’s hard to know how the court would interpret the state constitutional provision for the right to privacy in terms of this bill, but that based upon privacy-related court precedents, the law would be unnecessary.

The bill has only been introduced and referred to committee; lawmakers haven’t set a date to discuss it yet. While 18 of 25 of the state’s senators have signed on, including the Senate majority leader, it’s unclear whether the bill would stand a chance in the state House.

English said he believes the bill is constitutional. He said the state has a provision in its constitution to protect the right to privacy.

“Generally, we’ve respected people’s privacy but we have a different time now,” English said.

Like other destinations, Hawaii has a steady stream of high-profile visitors. President Barack Obama vacations on Oahu once a year with his family, while Lance Armstrong escaped to the Big Island last month after a tell-all interview with Oprah Winfrey at his home in Texas.

Copyright (2013) Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Tags: , , ,

Next Up

More on Skift

SeaWorld Looks to Travel Agents to Help Reverse Attendance Woes
3 Digital Trends We’re Tracking At Skift This Week
4 Hospitality Trends We’re Tracking At Skift This Week
3 Ways to Guarantee Your Next Business Trip Won’t Be All Work and No Play