Digital Booking Sites

Court okays TripAdvisor’s top 10 lists based on user ratings

Excerpt from Forbes

Aug 29, 2012 12:36 pm

Skift Take

The “dirtiest” hotels on one of TripAdvisor’s lists sued for defamation, but because the lists are based off a compilation of user reviews, it is should be understood that they represent opinions, not facts.

— Samantha Shankman

Free Report: The Changing Business of Extended-Stay Hotels


“Best of” and “worst of” rankings are perennially popular fodder for publications.  They are great for grabbing headlines, stirring up controversy and baiting hyperlinks.  Their sensationalism means rankings–especially “worst of” rankings–also can be litigation-bait.  Fortunately, a recent court ruling found that publishing a “best of”/”worst of” ranking didn’t create defamation liability.  Surely, this opinion will appear on several “best of 2012″ lists itself.

Read the Complete Story →

Tags:

Next Up

More on Skift

Skift Business Traveler: American and US Airways Reveal a Sensible Combined Mileage Program
B2B Travel Startups Need to Show Personality on Social Media
Virgin Galactic Flight Crashes in Desert Killing One Test Pilot
Becoming Guest-Centric: Why Hotel Marketing Needs to Change